“Queen Elizabeth’s was a life well lived, a promise with destiny kept,” he said, in a speech that was praised for its emotionality and steadiness. His eyes were rheumy and his complexion florid his hair, thoroughly silver, was brushed as carefully as it had been in 1953 when, as a fidgety four-year-old, he had endured his mother’s almost three-hour-long coronation service, in Westminster Abbey. Being a king is not just one thing.Īfter Queen Elizabeth II died, at the age of ninety-six, on September 8, 2022, King Charles III delivered a televised speech-his first public address as monarch. But the portrait might also have suggested to the Prince-who would already have learned that he was destined to become Britain’s third King Charles-that to be a monarch is to be a divided self, in a role that is sometimes precariously split among the constitutional, the institutional, and the personal. For the young Charles, the principal fascination of the triple portrait may well have been in its proto-photographic quality-a high-class mug shot of a king ultimately judged to be a criminal. The forward-facing king appears supremely self-assured, even arrogant. The three-quarter king, who wears a dandyish pearl earring, has a faraway look in his eye, and a faint smile plays at the corner of his mouth.
The king in profile has a heavy brow: he appears thoughtful, even melancholy. Van Dyck’s triple portrait is, on its own terms, irresistibly suggestive of the psychological complexity of its royal subject. But the powers of the restored monarchy were more limited, and by the late seventeenth century the Glorious Revolution had affirmed the idea that British kings and queens retain their crowns only by the consent of the people.
Iss me at the stroke of midnight install#
The monarchy was abolished a week later, the office of the king declared by the Commons as “unnecessary, burdensome, and dangerous to the liberty, safety, and public interest of the people of this nation.” The Puritan republic lasted only eleven years, after which Parliament voted to install on the throne Charles II, the licentious eldest surviving son of the deposed king. On November 18, 1648-nearly three hundred years to the day before the birth of Charles, on November 14th-the King’s opponents argued in the House of Commons that “the Person of the King may and shall be proceeded against in a way of justice for the blood spilt.” After a brief trial, the royal head was publicly severed from the royal shoulders, on a scaffold outside the Banqueting House. He was sentenced to death by a High Court of Justice, set up by a Parliament that he had antagonized by dissolving it repeatedly, which helped bring about devastating years of civil war. The triple portrait may have commanded the young Prince Charles’s attention because of his royal precursor’s lurid fate: Charles I had the distinction of being the only British king to be tried for treason and executed. Among other extravagant commissions, he asked Rubens to decorate the ceiling of the grand Banqueting House, in London’s Palace of Whitehall, with canvases illustrating heavenly approval of James I, his father. Charles I-who was devout, reserved, and convinced of his right to absolute power as the head of the Stuart dynasty-was a great patron of the arts. The painting was made about a decade after Charles’s accession, in 1625, and was used as a blueprint for a marble bust by Bernini. With his long, flowing hair cut fashionably shorter on one side, he is depicted wearing three distinct robes and three ornate lace collars, and he is accessorized with the blue sash of the Order of the Garter, Britain’s oldest chivalric order. Titled “ Charles I in Three Positions,” and painted in the sixteen-thirties by Van Dyck, the work offers three representations of the elegant monarch: in profile, facing forward, and in three-quarter view. “King Charles lived for me in that room in the castle,” he later said. The sensitive and reflective prince, who was born in 1948 and who by the age of seven was being tutored by a governess in the history of the nation-and of his historic family-was fascinated by the painting. His attention was arrested, however, by one unusual portrait: of King Charles I, displayed in the Queen’s Ballroom. “It’s just a background,” Charles later recalled. Pedalling furiously, he hardly registered the spectacular works from the Royal Collection on the walls. When King Charles III was a young prince, in the early nineteen-fifties, he sometimes propelled a ride-on toy around Windsor Castle, one of several royal residences where he spent his childhood.
0 kommentar(er)
